Ask Matt: Mayim Bialik’s Staying Power on ‘Jeopardy!’

Jeopardy Mayim Bialik
Jeopardy!, Inc.
Jeopardy!

Welcome to the Q&A with TV critic — also known to some TV fans as their “TV therapist” — Matt Roush, who’ll try to address whatever you love, loathe, are confused or frustrated or thrilled by in today’s vast TV landscape. (We know background music is too loud, but there’s always closed-captioning.)

One caution: This is a spoiler-free zone, so we won’t be addressing upcoming storylines here unless it’s already common knowledge. Please send your questions and comments to [email protected] (or use the form at the end of the column) and follow me on Twitter (@TVGMMattRoush). Look for Ask Matt columns on many Tuesdays and Fridays.

Could Mayim Do Jeopardy! and a Sitcom at the Same Time?

Question: Straight to it: I absolutely love Mayim Bialik as host of Jeopardy! I can’t gush about her enough, and I’m not even going to try to explain what I mean because I think you get it. The former producer was my top pick, but I’m so glad he’s out and Mayim is in. My question is: If she were to become permanent host after we’re made to sit through Ken Jennings’ next stint, how do you think that will affect the future of Call Me Kat? I know I’m in the minority, but I adore that show. Related, I thought Brooke Burns would have been great as Jeopardy! host, but figured she wasn’t considered due to her current contract with Masterminds on GSN. It makes me wonder how Jennings is able to do Jeopardy! with his commitment to both Masterminds and The Chase? — Mark

Matt Roush: Isn’t it nice to have some continuity again on TV’s greatest quiz show? What mail I’m getting on Jeopardy! lately has been quite positive regarding Mayim Bialik settling in for a long run, and I imagine that would have been true for nearly anyone they would have picked to move the show forward after the unfortunate Mike Richards incident. Her enthusiasm and engagement with the contestants help make the show a pleasure to watch again, though I refuse to speculate about what comes next after the headaches through the first half of 2021. (The “we’re made to sit through” crack suggests Mark isn’t a fan of Ken Jennings in the role, but as a consulting producer for the show, he’s not going anywhere anytime soon).

About juggling Jeopardy! with other gigs: Keep in mind that while hosting Jeopardy! isn’t for amateurs, it’s also not a full-time occupation necessarily, with a full week’s episodes taped in a single day two days a week, roughly every other week. This would presumably give Mayim Bialik plenty of time to work this around her sitcom taping schedule, and the same goes for Jennings’ other commitments. Should either be lucky enough to be named permanent host sometime in the new year, or even sharing the job going forward, they might need to set new priorities eventually. But for now, it’s probably doable.

Getting Hooked on New Fall TV

Question: Of the new fall shows, I really like CBS’ Ghosts and ABC’s The Wonder Years (kudos to Dulé Hill). I’m wondering which shows are “can’t miss” for you? — CCM

Matt Roush: As has been the case in recent years, there aren’t nearly as many new network shows to pick from as there used to be. By coincidence, in the next issue of TV Guide Magazine (out next week), I’m reviewing both Ghosts and The Wonder Years very positively as the fall’s breakout comedies. They’re both terrific in very different ways, and I haven’t missed an episode of either yet. I had high expectations for The Wonder Years, given my fondness for the original series, but Ghosts is a particularly delightful surprise. Elsewhere, I’ve already made my admiration known for the ambitions of NBC’s Ordinary Joe, and I’m trying to find time to catch up on Fox’s intriguing The Big Leap to see how it’s coming along. Beyond that, the only new show I’m watching avidly — make that hate-watching — is NBC’s La Brea as the guiltiest of cheesy pleasures.

The State of NCIS Minus Gibbs

Question: I’m still mourning the loss of Gibbs on NCIS but giving Alden Parker (Gary Cole) a chance as his replacement. Since Cole’s contract is for one year, wouldn’t it be interesting to bring Scott Bakula in from NCIS: New Orleans as a permanent replacement, especially since his wife previously worked in the DOJ? It would be a natural work transfer for both of them and would make for an interesting team dynamic. Your thoughts? — Cathy

Matt Roush: They could certainly do worse, and it might help appease the fans who are still agitated that CBS took NCIS: New Orleans off the air after seven seasons. Still, for however long Gary Cole’s contract is with the show, it shouldn’t be underestimated what a smart move it was for NCIS to land someone with his considerable chops, distinguished resumé and undeniable charisma to see the series through this transition.

Comment: I guess there are more ridiculous ways to write off Gibbs on NCIS, but CBS wins the Oscar for an unsatisfying, disrespectful storyline. They seem to have a knack for getting rid of people in a disjointed, weak, nonsensical manner. Very disappointing. — Diane

Matt Roush: Not to pick on Diane, but vague yet negative comments like these tend to frustrate me. What was disrespectful about seeing Gibbs happy for a change? Does finding peace after a long career with a fair share of violence and tragedy make one weak? I get it that many fans will never be satisfied that Gibbs/Mark Harmon has left NCIS as a regular presence, regardless of how it played out. (Maybe the dissatisfaction comes from Gibbs being suspended and ending this chapter of his career in exile rather than receiving the hero’s tribute he deserves.) But would it have been better for him to go out in a hail of bullets, instead of receding into the distance — since it was McGee who flew off into the sunset — so when the time comes he can make a special appearance from time to time? His departure wasn’t really a surprise, given the events of this multi-episode arc. But I’m not sure it qualifies as ridiculous, either.

Should Al Get More Serious About Afghanistan?

Question: CBS’ United States of Al started off the second season with a very strong show about the fall of Afghanistan. Since then, however, they have barely mentioned it. I mean they are talking about trying to get Al’s sister to the U.S. but, besides that, if you missed the first episode you wouldn’t even know they were talking about it! Is this just because it’s kind of impossible to talk about it without getting political and they don’t alienate anybody? Especially in today’s environment! Just find it sad. They had such a great opportunity and they seem to be blowing it! — Mac S

Matt Roush: I would recommend patience. Only three episodes have aired, and the writers are still processing how to balance humor with the harsher realities of current events. Case in point: Next week, on Oct. 28, the episode will deal with Al having panic attacks from stress, causing his new family to urge him to seek treatment. A week later, the episode will seemingly be much lighter, dealing with Al’s romantic life when he begins dating Ariana. And the storyline about getting his refugee sister to America continues as well. So while I agree that the season premiere was powerful, a show like this can’t hit that beat every week.

As you’ll see in the following question, almost any time a sitcom takes a serious turn there’s pushback from fans who would rather just be entertained. Add that to the polarized politicization of nearly everything in today’s society, and United States of Al has a more delicate balancing act to pull off than most. Give it time, and also the latitude to turn away from the tragedy in Afghanistan on occasion, though I’m sure the result will sometimes feel forced and clumsy. Bottom line: This is not a documentary, and in the big picture, they’re trying to do right by this difficult situation.

Lighten Up, Young Sheldon!

Comment: I never watched The Big Bang Theory but have been an ardent fan of Young Sheldon since Day 1. It has been laugh-out loud funny and also touching. BUT this season is downright depressing. I realize they are trying to set up the family history/dynamic that is known later, but can’t they take some dramatic liberties and keep the show in an uplifting tone? We need laughs and not sorrow watching a family fall to shambles. Curious if you agree? — Scott

Matt Roush: Now that it’s in its fifth season, I figure Young Sheldon has earned the right to add some dramatic meat to its whimsy, which hasn’t entirely gone away. (Wallace Shawn and Ed Begley Jr.’s drunken duet on “Lollipop,” for instance. And anything involving Meemaw.) George Sr.’s health issues, his momentarily wandering eye sending him on a major guilt trip, and now Georgie facing the consequences of dropping out of school are all solid and credible situations. It doesn’t necessarily turn Young Sheldon into a downer. But it’s also the case that like with many family comedies, as the kids get noticeably older the tone begins to shift, because they’re not as cute as they used to be. Which leads to the next question.

And Finally …

Question: The kids on Young Sheldon are sure growing up. Don’t you think it’s about time Missy and Sheldon got their own rooms? — Maria W

Matt Roush: I’ve been seeing comments like this for quite some time, and I imagine it wasn’t lost on you that Missy’s first reaction upon hearing that dropout Georgie might be moving out — or might be thrown out by his angry dad — was to call dibs on his room. I’m not intimately familiar with the layout of the Cooper house, but if they had an extra room that could be turned into a bedroom for Missy, they probably would have done it long ago. But selfishly from the writers’ point of view, some of the best scenes of any Young Sheldon episode are those in which Sheldon and Missy share their secret thoughts (and insults) after lights out, and I bet the producers want to keep that going for as long as they reasonably can.

That’s all for now. We can’t do this without your participation, so please keep sending questions and comments about TV to [email protected] or shoot me a line on Twitter (@TVGMMattRoush), and you can also submit questions via the handy form below. (Please include a first name with your question.)




Conversation14 Comments

Please read the TV Insider Community Guidelines.

Comments are closed on this story.

  1. C

    CyanFries

    Regarding "United States of Al", they did give a rather blatant nod to the events in Afghanistan in the second episode this season, too, with Riley at his therapy session, and having to acknowledge how his new job had affected him in terms of his struggle to deal with what's been going on in the news. It was kind of the whole point of the episode. I think they've done a great job of walking the line of addressing those issues in both overt and subtle ways thus far, and I'm looking forward to seeing how they continue to address them going forward.

    3

  2. G

    GoldCorn

    I want Ken Jennings really bad. She gets on my nerves, mispronounces words quite often, and when she tries to make a joke, she fails. Pleas put Ken on and leave him, he did a great job, he has always loved Jeopardy-PUT HIM ON!

    2

  3. R

    RedSushi

    I do not enjoy Mayim Bialik as host! Alex rarely doted over the winning contestant. Everyday Mayim goes on about the latest win streak meanwhile putting added pressure onto the two other contestants! Whether it is because Mike Richards isn't there or the writers are lost but I sure miss Alex. It all seems so scripted and I just want to get on with the game.

    2

  4. B

    BlueRadio

    I agree about Bialik

    She is too full of herself so she draws attention to herself...which is obnoxious. She doesn't know how to pronounce foreign languages. Alex aid he spent hours with a coach practicing. Of course he wasn't having a second gig while doing Jeopardy.

    Alex was so perfect in his everyday manner. He wasn't trying to impress.

    LASTLY, I wish she would not say "NO" so sharply. Sounds like mama scolding a child.

    I don't even know your choice. I wish they would just hire Jennings.

    5 3

  5. P

    PurplePuzzle

    Mayim keeps announcing the winner before he reveals his answer. She does this by stating the 2nd revealer is in 2nd place. Clearly the 1st revealer is in last with zero dollars.

    Baffling how no one on jeopardy is seeing this. She has done it at least 3 times.

    1

  6. P

    PurpleCocktail

    I think mayim is condescending and awful on Jeopardy Gives me a

    night to have dinner out.

  7. B

    BlueSailboat

    Oh, Lorre gets politics or at least his liberal views, in every show he makes. And he couldn't go "political" in the US of Al because then one of the characters would have had to say what everyone else is saying, that Biden botched the withdrawal big time and betrayed Americans stuck there & those who helped the Americans, big time!

  8. B

    BlueSailboat

    Not only that, but there is a constant commercial for some product with her saying she's a "real" "neuroscientist." And, before fast-forwarding through the rest of it, I yell at the TV everytime, "No, you're not, you're a typical liberal/woke hollywood actress, who could've been a neuroscientist."

  9. P

    PurpleMustache

    Love Biliak for permanent Jeopardy host. Knowledgeable, professional, courteous, outgoing, fun and you can hear her. Often Jennings so soft spoken you really need to listen.

    7 7

    1. A

      Antonio Montealegre

      Mostly agree with that!

      2 1

  10. O

    OrangeCoathanger

    I am mystified by those who have said the way Gibbs left was somehow disrespectful. I can only speculate that these people may have wanted some big romance story line with (insert female character of choice) or to have some type of miraculous return of Shannon and Kelly - something that reads like fanfiction. On the other hand, I would not want them to bring on Scott Bakula as Pride primarily because of the way they rewrote the character in the last season, plus this was a character that was very much a part of the whole New Orleans ethos. Just don't think it would work in the DC environment.

    1 1

  11. G

    GreenTurtle

    Since Scott never watched Big Bang theory, he is unaware of the many many comments that Sheldon made about his family growing up. Outside of Meemaw, almost all of them were negative. I hope Young Sheldon follows the timeline set up on Big Bang. This includes the father's death.

    1 1

    1. C

      CyanBus

      True, but he had the perspective of a child. Granted, a precocious child, but still a child, which leaves a lot of wiggle room in how they portray the family.

      3

  12. A

    Antonio Montealegre

    Chuck Lorre is not Norman Lear so I don't think "The United States of Al" will go the Lear route of being political every ep. But one way the show is like Lear is when they continue storylines ep to ep like the one about Al's sister...

    1 1