‘Vikings’ Attack Paris: How Closely Did the TV Show Follow History?

Vikings - Travis Fimmel as Ragnar Lothbrok
Jonathan Hession/History
Vikings Ragnar Lothbrok

Update: Craving a taste of Season 4? See photos from the upcoming season here.


On Vikings, King Ragnar announced to his men their next target: Paris.

“Paris? What is Paris?” Rollo spits.

“That is a good question, brother,” says Ragnar. “By all accounts, Paris is a huge, walled, well-protected city. This is something our people have never attempted or dreamt of before.”

Vikings Attack Paris

.

History Channel has teased that Vikings would be looking beyond Scandinavia and Britain to add Francia to Ragnar’s conquests. And the storyline matches up with the real history of a Viking siege orchestrated by one of the historical figures on which the show’s Ragnar Lothbrok is based. The character has progressed from farmer and father to sailor, explorer, raider, earl, diplomat, and, as of the Season 2 finale, king – more titles than any one man can achieve in a lifetime. But scholars believe that the “real” Ragnar, who has so many incredible feats associated with his name, was not a single man but a legendary conflation of several different warriors and kings.

RELATED: Vikings‘ Paris Attack Might Be the Show’s Most Ambitious Battle Yet. Here’s How They Did It.

Series creator Michael Hirst says that while a great deal of research goes into the show’s writing and production, his goal isn’t to produce a documentary-style history lesson. “I’m not looking for accuracy per se … if there was an accurate version, all historians would agree on it, and historians never agree,” Hirst says. “But I think what I’m looking for is authenticity, plausibility, consistency, and as much truth as is possible within a drama.”

The Danish Viking Reginheri, one of the figures scholars link to the legend of Ragnar Lothbrok, led a violent series of attacks on what is now France and sieged Paris, which was then an island city, in the year 845. Historical accounts indicate that he sailed a fleet of about 120 ships along the Seine, raiding the city of Rouen as he progressed. After Rouen, West Frankish King Charles the Bald sent an army to protect the Abbey of Saint Denis, but Reginheri’s raiders routed this force and hanged 111 of their prisoners as a tribute to Odin. They went on to pillage Paris, staying until King Charles the Bald offered a payment of nearly 5,700 pounds of gold and silver for their departure.

Hirst attributes his Ragnar’s impending sail to Paris to the character’s insatiable curiosity and need to explore. For Hirst, Ragnar is akin to the Norse god Odin, who, according to Germanic mythology, was willing to sacrifice his own eye in pursuit of new knowledge.

“That’s what also drives Ragnar, and it’s a kind of, in a sense, it’s a desire for fame, too, a fame for discovering or leading the Vikings to these places,” Hirst said. “And fame isn’t celebrity, fame is doing something amazing.”

[jwplatform DY3XmP7q]

BEHIND THE SCENES: What it Took to Film the Vikings’ Paris Raid

Reginheri’s motivations for attacking Paris may not have been so idealistic. Before his invasion, Reginheri had been granted some land in Frisia—a region now part of Germany and the Netherlands–by Charles the Bald. The siege of Paris in 845 may have been vengeance for losing that land, and the large series of payments that King Charles offered were likely compensation for the territory Reginheri lost.

The historical gap between the earliest Viking raids and Reginheri’s siege is significantly longer than the chronology that Vikings has covered so far, but Hirst views the attack as a way to demonstrate to the TV audience how quickly the scale of Viking raids escalated during that period of history.

Vikings in Paris Season 3 Episode 10

Princess Gisla and Emperor Charles in Season 3

“It’s thrilling, I must say, and it seemed to me totally in line with the character Ragnar, this semi-mythic character, that’d I’d helped to create,” Hirst says. “It is consistent with the philosophy, the way I’m doing the show, I think, even though the chronology is slightly ajar.”

It’s also the nature of the TV business. Vikings is a popular show, but there are no guarantees about how long it will remain on the air. Hirst said that he was too excited about the siege to risk pushing it to a future season.

Along with bloody battles, the Paris attack will stoke the spiritual conflicts of characters Athelstan and Ragnar, struggles Hirst says are central to the show. Not only did Reginheri’s Viking campaign in West Francia involve the destruction of churches and culminate in an Easter-time attack on Paris, but it also fell victim to a deadly plague that may have been enough of a catalyst for some Vikings to convert to Christian practices. Hirst tells us that on the show, as the Parisians pray in their cathedral for God to smite the attackers with various afflictions, the Vikings will also contend with some spiritual unrest. “Ragnar, too, has moments of vision in which he sees both pagan and Christian figures,” Hirst says. “So [religion is] high up there. It’s one of the things that’s part of the signature of the show.”

Vikings Paris Attack- To the Gates

Clive Standen as Rollo in Season 3

Similarities between history’s Reginheri and History Channel’s Ragnar Lothbrok will likely end with the attack on the city of Paris. Reginheri supposedly died suddenly after returning from West Francia. One account, written by a monk of Saint Germain, states that God struck Ragnar down and caused his body to swell until he burst; a more likely explanation is that Reginheri died of plague-induced diarrhea, which, in terms of medieval medicine, could be construed as biblical bursting. It’s difficult to imagine History Channel sending out one of their biggest characters that way. Plus Hirst still has plenty of ideas about where to take the Vikings next, including Iceland, Greenland and possibly even North America.

“They found a trading post, or what they think is a Viking trading post in the Arctic Circle,” Hirst said. “And so, goodness knows where we can take these people [on the show.] I think it’s an education for me as much as for anyone else.”

[jwplatform bzSqwDnD]

VIDEO: Morgane Polanski on Playing Princess Gisla




Conversation11 Comments

Please read the TV Insider Community Guidelines.

Comments are closed on this story.

  1. P

    PurpleCorn

    I keep hoping that they adhere as closely as possible to actual history.

    Too many people already view history through the eyes of Hollywood producers.

    Some historical accountability is always welcome.

    4

    1. B

      BlueCone

      totally agree. I don't like how if the Viking raped and murdered, they are portrayed as being noble and heroic, when Wessex attacks the Viking settlement, sad, dramatic music is played and the heroism of the Vikings are dwelt on. Yet I see the vikings as the villains - they were the invaders, not the other way round.

      2 2

  2. R

    RedCloud

    For the most part, they have stuck pretty close to history. The only character that is off is Rollo, who came along about two or three generations later being born in 860 AD or 15 years after Ragnar's siege of Paris. Rollo, was actually the seized Roen in 876 and later made a treaty with the Frankish King for which he was created the First Duke of Normandy in 911 AD. Rollo was NOT Ragnar's brother, but was, in fact, Ragnars 3rd great grandson.

    4 1

  3. G

    GreenSushi

    Great show!

    1

  4. O

    OrangeCandy

    Brilliant show!

    1

  5. R

    RedPretzel

    Wasn't Ragnar killed by being thrown into a snake pit by King Aella? Afterwards Ragnar's (Ragenheir) sons killed King Aella by giving him a blood eagle..?

  6. G

    GreenSeahorse

    Fabulous! Can't wait for it to continue!

  7. O

    OliveHelmet

    This is an incredible series of extraordinary proportions - I truly like it...

  8. P

    PurpleBottleOpener

    Love this show

  9. O

    OrangeCherries

    Ragnar was not a real person. He was a legendary persona. Several different kings & warriors used the name. Like our superman...or batman. Great ppl wud then say...im the son of Ragnar. To make themselves as great as him. He was NOT a real person. The real viking who attacked Paris was Ragenheir or something similar like that.

    2 4

  10. G

    GreenElephant

    It was NOT EVEN CLOSE TO HISTORY. MIcheal Hurst says he doesn't want to gmake a documentary style history lesson. That is just an excuse to make his own story focused on watching the characters go through their feelings and pains instead of telling a story based on historical fact. Rollo, in real life, wasn't even born during the timeline of the series when they attack Paris. He was given land in the early tenth century, twelve years after Alfred, King Egbert's "grandson" was dead! It's yet another millennial production where this time it's "MILLENNIALS AS VIKINGS!" Come watch vikings be unsure about themselves with daddy issues. The thing about not wanting to do a documentary history lesson is you don't have to make a documentary history lesson when you decide to have historical accuracy in your show. That's just a false dilemma fallacy to say it is either what you want to make or it will be a documentary history lesson if you make it more historically accurate. It's just a millennial production with millennial attitudes superimposed over the context of the story. It is barely historical at all.

    5 8