Ask Matt: Golden Globes Fallout, ‘Midnight’ & ‘Mary’ Cancellations, Too Much Sameness in ABC Comedies?
Welcome back to the Q&A with TV critic Matt Roush (also known to some TV fans as their “TV therapist”), who’ll try to address whatever you love, loathe, are confused or frustrated or thrilled by in today’s vast TV landscape. One caution: This is a spoiler-free zone, so we won’t be addressing upcoming storylines here unless it’s already common knowledge. Please send your questions and comments to [email protected] (or use the form at the end of the column) and follow me on Twitter. Look for Ask Matt columns on most Tuesdays and Fridays.
Bad Hosts and Bad Choices at the Globes
Question: What producer went “I know who should host the Golden Globes! Andy Samberg and Sandra Oh will be amazing!” On a good day I tolerate him, and while I like Sandra Oh, she’s not exactly well known for her comedic chops. The opening monologue was the biggest dumpster fire I’ve ever seen. I stuck around as long as I could, but seeing the two of them on screen was PAINFUL at times. — Veronica
Question: The Golden Globes hosts were, if not the worst, very close to it, with the worst presentation of reading a teleprompter. It takes talent to read one, which they do not have. They should not be asked to host again. We quit watching about halfway in. — Bob
Matt Roush: I think it’s fair to say that this far-from-classic pairing was a one-time thing. How did the Andy-and-Sandy show come to be? They presented an award at last year’s Emmys with some fun comic chemistry, and the Globes producers figured they might be able carry an entire show. Sad to say, they couldn’t even pull off the monologue, which substituted irony for comedy in an attempt to kill with kindness. (The stunts, like pretending to give the celebrity crowd flu shots, were even worse.) I tend to agree about the teleprompter reading, although everyone on stage seemed to struggle with that. Maybe it was bad placement? Either way, I’ve rarely seen a less disciplined Globes broadcast. They usually even end on time.
Question: I’m under the impression Golden Globes are voted on by film critics. As Bohemian Rhapsody received mainly negative reviews, how could it be nominated, let alone win as best picture. – Mark
Matt Roush: The Globes tend to be all about buzz, and Rhapsody was a global hit. I was shocked that it upset A Star Is Born, and so was just about everyone else, I’m sure. (Given where Bradley Cooper and Lady Gaga were sitting, like king and queen of the prom, they and we were robbed of the coronation most were expecting.) I was also confused that both Rhapsody and Star competed in the drama, not musical, category. Maybe Star Is Born would have done better in the other group, although the support for Green Book was also surprisingly strong. It’s beyond me to explain such things, especially where that small and curious group of Hollywood Foreign Press voters is concerned. (And I won’t judge beyond that, because I still haven’t seen some of these movies, being consumed by the surge of TV most days. I did, however, enjoy A Star Is Born tremendously.)
Only Scrooge Would Cancel Midnight at Christmas!
Question: Shortly before Christmas, NBC not surprisingly canceled Midnight, Texas after two seasons. The shocking part of this was WHEN this happened, which was a week before Christmas! Why would NBC be a bunch of Scrooges and cancel the show (along with lumping it in with the cancellation of the mediocre sitcom Marlon) right before Christmas? Why couldn’t they wait until May 2019 to make a final decision, and think through about the fate of the show? The broadcast networks can be a cruel and unforgiving place for TV shows with a cult following. I know you may think it’s foolish of me to think about this, but I hope that either SyFy, Netflix, Hulu or Amazon can come to this show’s rescue. Midnight, Texas has as much of a large cult following as Timeless and Lucifer, and deserves a shot for another chance at life like these shows did with their die-hard fan bases. Midnighters (like the Clockblockers and Lucifans) never give up hope, and never stops fighting for the show they love! #SaveMidnightTexas — Chris B
Matt Roush: I feel your pain, but in some ways, it’s better for NBC to let the show go now in hopes of it finding another taker—by no means guaranteed—instead of stringing it along for months with virtually no chance of renewal. (The die was pretty much cast when Midnight was brought back on Fridays. NBC would have been better off keeping it around as cult summer filler on a weeknight.)
Seeking Closure With Killer Mary
Question: I read that Lifetime is not going to air the final season of Mary Kills People. Please say it’s not true. That would be unfair to us American fans. Where else are we supposed to watch it? Thank you! — Unsigned
Matt Roush: This appears to be the case, as Lifetime moves away (for now) from weekly scripted series—including the acclaimed You, which moves to Netflix for Season 2—to focus on its more popular movie slate. Given that Mary has filmed an entire third season, currently airing in Canada, I’d be surprised if a streaming service doesn’t pick the entire series up. (Hulu is currently streaming the first two seasons.)
ABC’s Comedies Feel Too Much the Same
Question: Why do you think ABC essentially got rid of all of their multi-cam comedies? I get that the trend over the last decade or so has been single-cam comedies, but doesn’t that kind of trap them into a stale sameness with all their shows? It seems like all their comedies are almost the same show, from black-ish, Speechless, Fresh Off the Boat, The Goldbergs, American Housewife, etc. being on the outside different, but so many elements you feel you could interchange with the others. They got rid of Last Man Standing, a decision they must still be kicking themselves over since it’s kicking their ass on Friday nights. It just feels like we once had shows that could be on the same lineup yet still have a distinctive appeal. Take CBS’s iconic Saturday night lineup from the ’70s: All in the Family, M*A*S*H, The Mary Tyler Moore Show, The Bob Newhart Show and The Carol Burnett Show. Sure, they’re all comedies, and they all maybe had some similar elements, but NONE of these were the same type of shows. It’s a problem with all the networks. I don’t get this laziness. — Reeve
Matt Roush: To be fair, there’s quite a bit of diversity reflected in ABC’s popular slate of family sitcoms, and you left out my current new favorite, The Kids Are Alright, which has a comic energy all its own. Plus for the next few weeks anyway, we still have The Conners, which like its predecessor Roseanne is filmed in the classic format with a studio audience and resultant track of laughter (which some people hate). I get your point, though: Because so many of ABC’s sitcoms are filmed single-cam style, there is a homogeneity to the formula, and for that you can probably blame the resounding success (in its early seasons) of Modern Family, which remains ABC’s signature comedy and no doubt influences what gets developed in the network’s pipeline. I agree that ABC almost surely regrets letting Last Man Standing go, and it would make sense for the network to diversify its style of comedy. As I often argue when people write in to complain about laugh tracks—by which they mean souped-up studio-audience sitcoms—they by and large have been the most popular comedies of any era, including today’s.
Bring Classic Casts Back Together
Question: I know you’re down on reboots and revivals, much like most people with any sense, but how do you feel about cast reunions? I loved on-air cast reunions like the ones for The Nanny back in ’03 or the reunion movies for Growing Pains and Perry Mason back in the day. Personally, I’d love to see the remaining cast of Everybody Loves Raymond, Seinfeld, Martin, Frasier, Just Shoot Me, Hill Street Blues, Married with Children, The Sopranos, The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, etc. reunite to talk about the series’ memories, each other and those that they lost from the show. — Ronni
Matt Roush: I tend to agree. Reunions can make for good TV—my favorite was when Carol Burnett’s ensemble would come back together to remember the good old days (with clips!)—and even some revivals (Will & Grace). In most cases, I’d rather see surviving casts go down memory lane than try to recapture the magic of another time, which can be fraught with dashed expectations.
Is Brooklyn Nine-Nine Overrated?
Question: Could I just ask…what’s the big deal about Brooklyn Nine-Nine? I mean from all the hype I heard about it and the bitching and moaning about its original cancellation, you would think it was the new Barney Miller as far as being a sophisticated, brilliantly literate comedy mixing dry, subtle wit with absurdity and a colorful ensemble cast, all of which have been considered one of the greatest casts ever assembled for TV if not THE greatest cast ever assembled. I never watched it myself because it seems overhyped, and usually I end up hating shows that are overhyped and overrated by people, but from what I do know about it, it just feels like Scrubs with cops, not anything fresh and unique like a Barney Miller or even a Scrubs when it came out. — Dale
Matt Roush: Did I miss something, that someone was comparing Brooklyn Nine-Nine to Barney Miller? I’m having trouble with the thought of trashing a show one hasn’t taken the trouble to watch just because others like it. The only thing these series have in common is a setting in a New York precinct. Styles of comedy, types of characters: Very different, as it should be. Both in their ways are underdogs—Barney because it went against the grain of its time with its melancholy realism, Brooklyn because its wacky sensibility puts it more in the “cult” category, and it’s never been what you’d call a monster hit, though most of its fans are passionate. And what’s wrong that that? If the show has been overhyped (which I don’t see), maybe that’s because in today’s environment, especially on the broadcast networks where so little breaks through, you’d be crazy to take renewal for granted.
That’s it for now. Thanks as always for reading, and remember that I can’t do this without your participation, so please keep sending questions and comments about TV to [email protected] or shoot me a line on Twitter (@TVGMMattRoush), and you can also submit questions via the handy form below. Please include a first name with your question.
Conversation16 Comments
Please read the TV Insider Community Guidelines.
Comments are closed on this story.
-
R
"I’m having trouble with the thought of trashing a show one hasn’t taken the trouble to watch just because others like it."
I'd give that...at least...100 Thumbs-Up!!!
7
-
G
I see this all the time, people ridiculing shows they don't watch. Some of my favorites like Last Man Standing and Marvel Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. are sometimes crucified by haters that haven't watched recently or never watched. Because they think LMS is just a conservative/republican comedy and AoS is a shallow super hero show. Far from the truth.
1
-
O
Last Man is definitely one of the most successful tv shows on right now for a reason and it's because its just a genuinely funny clean family show that from what I saw when it was cancelled appealed to different political parties republican\liberal\libertarian all of whom rallied behind the show, signed petitions etc. Hell, the irony is that this show is one of if not THE least agenda having or pushing show on the air other than The Middle or any of the food network shows etc. The show doesn't choose one side like everyone else does it explores multiple ones and give them all a voice. I also think people judge AoS because of season 1 but if they watched seasons 2-5 they'd realize how great that show has become
-
G
For the most part , each successive season of AoS improved upon the previous. Very rare feat.
1
-
G
I watch LMS. It's not really all that political. Just a few clever and humorous jabs here and there. It's mostly a solid family and workplace comedy.
1
-
-
G
Meh, I don’t care for reunions. They’re basically that horror of horrors, the clips show, just a bit glorified. Not for me. Remakes also generally are crummy (MacGyver, Magnum PU), but revivals tend to be lovely (Will & Grace, Prison Break). More revivals, fewer remakes, rare reunions would work for me.
1
-
O
I prefer revivals too though I stopped Will and Grace after six episodes. I just got what I wanted and didn't need to see more. But I would love a revival movie of Magnum Pi with the remaining three guys and would also enjoy seeing a revival of Married with childten of some capacity even if it's a hilarious nod to Newhart with Jay Pritchett waking up and realizing he's Al Bundy lol
-
-
O
Anyone who doesn't appreciate a multi cam with an audience doesn't really know great television. I enjoy single cams myself like The Bernie Mac Show, Everybody Hates Chris, Malcolm in the Middle, The Middle, the first season of Dear White People, Scrubs even Blackish and Fresh off The Boat but for me you can't beat a great theatrical experience with the great multi cams we had in the past. I can agree that most multi cams with an audience or laugh track that air today suck with very few exceptions (VERY FEW) and the laugh tracks today are obnoxiously loud and canned but anyone whose seen tv series like The Odd Couple (Jack Klugman and Tony Randall) The Fresh Prince of Bel air, Everybody Loves Raymond, All in the family, Martin, Living Single, The Bob Newhart Show, Sanford and Son, The Honeymooners, I Love Lucy etc they'd know how great the past eras for sitcoms really was and why they have fallen so short now
1
-
G
Don't forget "The D V D Show"!
-
-
G
About TV cast reunions: If the TV movie that reunites its characters is made years after its cancellation with the same cast and written and produced by the same person, then it's usually an enjoyable ride as it was when creator Sherwood Schwartz did with the cast of his "Gilligan's Island" and "The Brady Bunch". (Never mind that neither show was considered quality-oriented) But then there's "The Adams Family Halloween Special" from 1977, which was video taped and, I think, handled by a writer who didn't write for the series. It was so lame and didn't capture the spirit of the show at all! Even with most of the cast intact. The kind of reunion with the actors talking about experiences on the show was best handled when the cast of "The Mary Tyler Moore" show sat together and reminisced about when went on concerning the creation of many of the show's best eps especially "Chuckles Bits the Dust". Only Ted Knight didn't show up as he had passed years back before the '91 special...
-
R
Are we supposed to guess who, or what show, is pictured at the top of this article? the one on the left looks like it belongs in the lineup of The CW. (Except some of the characters look too old-- over 30.) The right one I can't even guess at.
(Also... "TV therapist"? People really need to use their brains.)
-
B
One on the left is MIDNIGHT, TEXAS. The one on the right I don't recognize but I'd guess would be MARY KILLS PEOPLE. Even if I don't recognize the shows, I can usually figure out the pics based on the questions.
-
R
Yeah, I sort of deduced that the left-hand pic was from Midnight (even though I've never seen the show). And I think Mary Kills People is probably a good guess for the other. But the point is, we shouldn't HAVE to guess. Even if there's no actual caption, the article could have an asterisk next to the title of the show in the photo, or bold the show title-- *something* that ties the title with the photo.
1
-
G
It is MARY KILLS PEOPLE. If you're not one of the ten people who watches that, you might be one of the ten people who watched WONDERFALLS, and recognize Caroline Dhavernas from that.
1
-
G
There is a caption under the pictures. Did they just add it?
-
R
Must have been just added recently, as it definitely wasn't there yesterday.
-