‘Blue Bloods’ Boss Previews Series Finale: ‘Every Victory Has to Come With a Loss’
Finale
On December 13, 2024, the Reagan family offers its final salute as Blue Bloods ends its 14-year command of Friday nights. The well-loved CBS family cop series—which still holds a seat among the top 10 broadcast series—concludes with Season 14.
Below, showrunner Kevin Wade, who’s been a part of Blue Bloods since its series premiere on September 24, 2010, offers TV Insider a preview of the highly-anticipated ending.
When did you begin to formulate your plan for the series finale?
Kevin Wade: Well, we had a whole season where we knew this was the last lap, so we all started talking collectively pretty early, and it was decided that Siobhan [Byrne O’Connor] and I would write the series finale. And so we started months before, talking like, what are the show’s greatest hits? What are the things that we love to do, the audience seems to love, and how can we do them in a new and fresh way, but pay some attention to what’s worked in the past?
What are the most important stories and scenes that had to be part of the series finale?
[Co-writer] Siobhan Byrne O’Connor and I decided early that the finale that would work best for our wonderful large cast were stories where all of them are in pursuit of [the same] syndicate. So while each main character would have a separate alley to walk down, they were working toward finding the same criminal. That makes for the most propulsive way we can tell all four stories at once. And of course, the family dinner scene took a lot of attention just in terms of who would be there and why and would anything be promised or revolved.

Michael Parmelee / CBS
This is, sorry to say, literally the last supper.
May lightning not strike us. [Laughs] But yes, this is the last supper.
Besides the usual weekly dinner crew, what visitors can you tease show up at the Sunday table?
There are a few black sheep, including one who’s been with us on and off for many years. I have to be vague here. There are blood relatives who we haven’t seen much of in a while who are present. I will say it’s a bigger table than usual. [Laughs] The art department had to actually go into the wood shop and make an extra leaf!
You mentioned the episode is a propulsive one. Can you set up the story, which starts with the shocking murder of a judge?
In the first act, we see violent crimes and attempted murders, which don’t seem at all connected until Assistant District Attorney Erin Reagan [Bridget Moynahan] and [her investigator] Anthony [Steve Schrippa] are played a recording that will make clear that the crimes are an orchestrated effort to create chaos in New York City. Then it becomes the Reagans’ job—police commissioner Frank [Tom Selleck], detective Danny [Donnie Wahlberg], sergeant Jamie [Will Estes], and patrol Eddie [Vanessa Ray]—along with Erin and Anthony, to haul in all the nets and find out if they can solve the crimes. Gang leader Carlo Ramirez [Manny Perez], who had to flee the country, is integral to the criminal plot. He has a very identifiable objective of vengeance and comes back to wreak havoc and reclaim his child.
While all this unfolds, Frank is–symbolically—given “the keys to the city” by Mayor Chase (Dylan Walsh). What can you say about that?
Without revealing the plotting, in the course of our 14 years, something would remind us a few times a season that the police commissioner serves at the pleasure of the mayor; it’s something that Frank lived with since day one. And while he fought against many mayors, his relationship with Mayor Chase is more like strange bedfellows than sworn enemies. And so, when he has an opportunity to actually serve the mayor in a way that’s not about the bureaucracy but about a man helping out a colleague, he grabs it.
How does that affect the commissioner?
Only in that he goes back to his purpose as a cop as he reminds himself and anyone who would listen that he was still basically a cop. So when a cop has the opportunity to go get the bad guy, he’s going to take it. That’s where his skillset still lives.
There’s a photo released with the Reagan clan in full force at a funeral that has fans guessing who has died. Without naming the person, what does that scene mean in the context of the series finale?
To sound highfalutin, and forgive me for that, one of the guiding principles of the show’s storytelling over most of its life—and as we went on, it sharpened—is that every victory has to come with a loss. It’s as simple as that. The stories that were most moving we found were where, yes, the Reagans individually or collectively had a victory, but it came at a cost.
To soften the loss, can you say there’s mostly a happy ending for the Reagan clan?
Happy’s a pretty subjective term. I think there’s a satisfying ending for all the Reagans. It’s a family individually and collectively who deal with loss and loneliness and good versus bad. You know, the sun doesn’t come out and all the stuff that they deal with goes away, that would not be true to 14 years of storytelling. But our hope is that it satisfying for the audience.
Blue Bloods, Series Finale, Friday, December 13, 10/9c, CBS
Conversation10 Comments
Please read the TV Insider Community Guidelines.
Comments are closed on this story.
-
P
How very sad for all of us fans. These 14 years have absolutely flown by. The show has brought laughter as well as tears and I’m sure that’s how it will end. Make sure you have the super large box of tissues standing by😔😭😢🤧
10 2
-
G
Cannot believe they still insist on cancelling this show! What a waste of the talented actors and writers of this show. Of course it has to be CBS's call. CBS apparently has no regard for the fans or the cast and crew of this show. I hope and pray another channel will pick it up but I won't hold my breath. This show's ending is like losing a family member that is much loved. Shame on you CBS, I am greatly disappointed in you.
8 2
-
C
Whoever signed off on canceling this Great show needs a reality check. The ratings are very good, the Cast & Crew were more than willing to keep it going. Absolutely the stupidest move in Television. Nice going CBS .You suck
3 1
-
P
Blue Bloods is my favorite show. Fans have begged CBS to reconsider the cancellation, but they obviously don't care what the fans think. I will not watch whatever goes into that Friday night time slot. CBS cancelled NCIS Hawaii at the last minute and as soon as NCIS is over, I turn to another station. It's my own personal boycott of CBS cancelling top rated shows.
3 1
-
P
You really are one sick pup
2
-
O
I think your white sheets are ready for the dryer now. Better yet, climb in there with them, maybe you'll get the stupid tumbled out.
1
-
O
Not as satisfying as it could/should have been, imho. Also, a little predictable in some respects.
-
O
I really hope it's not Badillo whose funeral everyone goes to. I like Badillo, and Jamie lost a partner on the job years ago; I think it would be bad writing to have Eddie lose hers as well. Not to mention mind-bogglingly unlikely.
1
-
O
That would be a terrible ,yet realistic story line. Have enjoyed this show for 14 years. I need no tragedy to make the series final any sadder. No new Blue Bloods is sad enough. I am so dissappointed at CBS.
4 1
-
R
It looks like they're ending the series by giving Eddie all of Jamie's stories and so there's been nothing left for Jamie. I'm embarrassed for the writers if this is what they came up with after months of planning.
-
