‘Survivor’: What Jeff Probst Really Thinks About That Shot in the Dark Sacrifice
Spoiler Alert
[Warning: The following contains MAJOR spoilers for Survivor Season 47 Episode 10, “Loyal to the Soil.”]
It’s a shot in the dark, and Jeff Probst will take it, literally. Survivor 47 players willingly sacrificed every single one of the remaining Shot in the Dark advantages in exchange for a large bag of rice for the tribe in the November 20 episode on CBS. This marks the second time this season that the cast has made more interesting use of this advantage than its intended purpose. Although Probst originally demanded that no less than four players sit out of the challenge in order to get the food stash, the final nine countered with a stunning offer he couldn’t refuse. The host was vocal about his shock in the episode, but Probst also shared more of his feelings about this bold move in the Survivor aftershow, the On Fire podcast (listen to this week’s episode for free with no ads below).
The rice negotiation began before the individual immunity challenge in Season 47 Episode 10, which marked Kyle’s fourth individual win (he’s close to joining the small group of Survivor players who have won the record of five individual challenges). Caroline offered for two players to give up their Shots in the Dark instead of four players being benched, which Probst rejected. Then Kyle suggested that all of the players give up their 1-in-6 shot at immunity. Sam needed some convincing, but Gabe eventually changed his mind. When they were all in, Probst agreed to take the Shots in the Dark out of the competition, and On Fire confirmed they’re “gone for the rest of the season,” as cohost Jay Wolff said.
Rachel already played her shot in Episode 8 in what Probst called a “brilliant” move that had the potential to change the game forever. Keeping her individual immunity idol secret, Rachel played her Shot in the Dark before the votes were read to gauge the reactions among the merged tribe. When no one looked worried that she might be immune, Rachel knew that she wasn’t the target for elimination. As of Episode 10, she’s still keeping her idol for a rainy day. The advantage had never been used that way before. Getting another new use just two episodes later was unexpected and shows this cast’s ability to think quickly.
“The Shot in the Dark in the game allows for more blindsides. You’ve said that on this podcast,” Wolff said to Probst in On Fire. “Was there some hesitation from you from a producer perspective that trading in all these Shots in the Dark would make the game less unpredictable?” Probst replied that his immediate reaction was to quickly think about if or how this could “break” the game overall.
CBS
“The offer to sacrifice all their Shots in the Dark in exchange for rice played out in real time, so my decision was also happening in real time,” Probst shared. “In moments like that, you’re quickly using your critical thinking to go through a mental checklist of any really obvious game-breaking problems that this deal might cause. You’re also weighing the value of the offer. Is this a real sacrifice for them? Is it worth the rice? You’re also still in host mode, so you’re having a conversation with the group while you’re watching the reactions of the players to see if there’s any story coming from this, like Sam having to be talked into it.”
“Hanging above all of these other considerations is the human in me thinking these are real people, they’re busting their butts in this game. That’s good. The gameplay is so tight, nobody wants to give up their shot at immunity. That’s good. And they’ve come up with a pretty inventive idea. That’s also good,” Probst went on. “So Jeff, you got to really consider it. And finally, yes, I’m also considering the impact of the obvious thing, which is you’re losing that dramatic element at tribal, which does create a lot of uncertainty. So after considering all of this during those 10 seconds, I ultimately felt it was a very strong offer and quite likely to result down the line in at least one player at some point regretting their decision to give up their Hail Mary. So I said yes.”
He warns future contestants that just because he let this happen in Season 47, doesn’t mean he’ll let it happen again: “Remember, future players, every season is unique for the players. It’s also unique for me. I go back to a familiar refrain: on Survivor, history is merely an indicator of what has happened, but not a predictor of what might happen in the future.”
Cohost Charlie Davis says that Rachel is “looking like a super genius” now because of this group decision (even without her Shot in the Dark as an option, she consented to this move). “She’s the only one that got to even use her Shot in the Dark at all and now she gives up nothing and gets rice. Go, Rachel.”
With the Shot in the Dark safety net gone and no one playing immunity idols, everyone but Kyle could’ve been eliminated in this episode. The votes were split between Gabe and Genevieve, but Gabe got the boot.
What did you think of this negotiation? Are you happy to see Shot in the Dark removed for now? Would you like to see players try negotiating to bring the advantage back into the game before the season ends? Clearly, anything is possible in Survivor. Let us know your thoughts in the comments section, below.
Survivor, Wednesdays, 8/7c, CBS
The Tribe Has Spoken
Get absolutely everything about Survivor in your inbox!
Conversation12 Comments
Please read the TV Insider Community Guidelines.
Comments are closed on this story.
-
G
It would have been better if Jeff opened each shot after the deal was done to see who would have been safe with the shot.
11 1
-
R
Doesn't work that way. Each shot is a 1 in 6 chance to be safe. They each have 6 things to choose from. It's not 1 in 6 people safe, each person is 1 in 6. Really against the odds. I think only twice it worked.
1
-
-
C
Will you finally learn shots in the dark suck?
10
-
G
No way would 4 of this tribe sit out. The renogotiated trade off clearly worked in their favor -- those stupid things are basically inconsequential! The only way Shots in the Dark would be of interest to me is if at the beginning of the Season, viewers were told a certain number of them were "valid," we saw them pick, and it was revealed to those of us in tv-land which were "true saves," as they did so.
6 1
-
R
Hilarious cause I feel a majority of us said this is exactly how useless the shot in the dark is Jeff lol. The one successful use of it also saw the player eliminated the next round sort of taking away the value
5 1
-
O
I would argue that Rachel's use was the true version of successful.
-
-
R
The fans get a sense of who might be going home at tribal. For once I would like to be surprised with someone else.
2
-
O
I think the show is getting worse,they need more idols, better rewards,make it more interesting for the viewer
1
-
O
I would rather see the Shot have a better chance of working. Say, 1 in 4.
1
-
P
Here's what we think of your stupid twists Jeff.
1
-
O
To gain their shot in the dark back, they can negotiate by not competing during the immunity challenge.
-
B
Rachel used her shot brilliantly but it can never be used that way again. The next group will assume the next person who uses it has an idol and they will be voted off ASAP.
IMO the shot makes the game too chaotic. It’s difficult enough to vote for a particular person; if they loose the vote and don’t play an idol, it should be over. Random chance should not come into play.
Watchlist Easy access to only the shows you care about — all in one simple place
Alerts Only important notifications — when a show is returning, when it becomes available to stream, and more.
Special Offers Exclusive products we release related to your favorite shows and streaming services