Did the Jury Choose the Right ‘Survivor’ Season 43 Winner? (POLL)
Spoiler Alert
Well, that Survivor finale was… a finale. Viewers may have expected Cassidy to take home the $1 million after she won Final Immunity and knocked frontrunner Jesse out the game by sending him to make fire. Or perhaps Owen’s underdog story was a narrative the jury wanted to reward. By looks of social media reactions, it seems most viewers did not have Gabler winning Survivor Season 43 on their Bingo card. Admittedly, we didn’t either. Then again, who didn’t presume Jesse would walk away victorious?
Perhaps the Survivor edit made it clear to some that Jesse’s thrilling long game would come to a heartbreaking end in the Fire Making Challenge. After the merge, Cody and Jesse were painted as the ones to beat by the edit, but in each episode Cody’s edit grew sillier as Jesse’s grew more impressive. By the time Jesse expertly blindsided Cody in Episode 12 (the edit keeping Cody returning his idol to Jesse a secret until Episode 13), the show had made it abundantly clear that the tightest pair of the season would soon be broken. It was a move so big, it seemed to lock in Jesse’s win with the jury.
In the Reunion Show immediately following Final Tribal Council, the jury said Gabler was the only one whose pitch checked all of their boxes. It’s puzzling to see how the group reached this conclusion, as it contradicts their reactions to big moves made in Tribals. The jury was so verbally in support of a Jesse win because of his season-long strategic strikes that never failed once. Only failing at fire could take him out. And the jury cheered for Jesse as he played, indicating the $1 million was in the bag if only he made it into the Final Three.
CBS
To that end, Cassidy was smart to send Jesse to Fire. Winning Final Immunity, in this format of the game, means you win control of the finale puppet strings fair and square. She chose to send Gabler to Fire, trusting he’d beat Jesse in that battle over Owen, whom she wanted by her side in the Final Three.
Jesse was never in danger at previous Tribal Councils (Karla wrote his name in her last vote to break his no-vote streak), showing his skill in keeping himself off of the chopping block despite being a major player and his powers of persuasion to get votes to go his way. Cassidy’s name, on the other hand, was tossed around a lot as a vote option.
As she noted in her jury pitch, she had a hand in eliminating nearly every person who wanted her gone, showing the strength of her social bonds (she was always given vote intel) and her ability to ride the waves and successfully persuade.
Owen got some votes in Episode 3 and Gabler never got one, but as Cassidy said, it’s because the strong players wanted them in the Final Three to make them look better to the jury. Owen took the underdog angle to his pitch, saying he evolved from one of the worst to one of the most trusted players — and the season’s highest Individual Immunity winner.
Gabler’s pitch was essentially that he could have played better in challenges, but chose not to to make himself look like less of a threat. He said his free-agent plan, paired with his non-threatening physical play, is what made him the best player of the season.
Was it just us, or did the edit not support that pitch at all? In confessionals, Gabler talked of being an “assassin” that was “hiding in plain sight.” But the only elimination he orchestrated was Elie’s just before the merge, and in most other instances he was simply brought into votes to help the numbers. To viewers, it’s hard to see where the “alliGabler” jumped out throughout the season.
CBS
He had some occasional strong moments, winning one Individual Immunity against Cody (and setting a record while doing it — Karla and Owen also set a record a couple of episodes later), but he truly wasn’t a threat for most of the season. One can hardly say winning the Fire challenge is a game-winning resume booster. Yes, building a fire takes skill, but that game is half skill, half chance. Notably, viewers knew Gabler planned on donating his possible winnings to veterans charities. The jury did not, but learned of the plan in the Reunion and were moved.
This jury was ready to give Jesse the $1 million because of the massive moves he played that all players agreed would go down in Survivor history. If impressive big moves is what they were looking for, Cassidy had the resume for that. We’ve seen players argue their subdued game was actually a strength before. If that’s what you were going for, would the finale not be the time for a plot-twisting display of skills, delivered before the Fire challenge? Surely making fire alone can’t be what someone should bank on. It’s not all that surprising that Gabler got votes in the end, but it is shocking that he got seven out of eight.
Gabler’s performance in the finale wasn’t that of a strategic assassin. Perhaps the edit did him a disservice, but perhaps there simply wasn’t footage to support his argument? Based on the season’s edit and the finale pitches, do you think the right player won Survivor Season 43? Let us know in the poll, below.
Survivor Season 43, All Episodes Streaming Now, Paramount+
The Tribe Has Spoken
Get absolutely everything about Survivor in your inbox!
Conversation17 Comments
Please read the TV Insider Community Guidelines.
Comments are closed on this story.
-
O
Terrible ending. Selfish jury who selected someone who was not a player. Both Cassidy and Owen deserved to win. Survivor honors lying, cheating and stealing. How could this be good for America.
21 6
-
G
couldn't agree more
3
-
-
R
I was shocked at the outcome. I viewed Gabler as a really nice guy who wasn’t a threat - and THAT is why he was in the Final Four. In every season of Survivor, there is someone who makes it to the end because they aren’t a threat to win. That was Gabler. From what CBS aired, this outcome doesn’t seem fair to the other 2 finalists.
13 3
-
O
There were people voted out in the first few days that had a lengthier resume than Gabler. Was something missed in filming or editing, or was the jury collectively coming to conclusions beforehand offset? Wow. Real head scratcher
11 2
-
O
Gabler was a goat , who was a flip vote for anybody who wanted one . I think there was alot of sour grapes in the jury which is getting pretty common on this show . I wonder if some people would change thier vote after watching the show. They should go back to 2 finalist like they used to. And I miss Jeff saying guys !!!!!
7
-
O
Cassidy should’ve won. Genuine person. Stay Positive Cassidy your intuition is your gift. I was sooo happy to see the three of them on the jury. They worked awesome together. Gabler can do what he wants with his $. Great job!!
7
-
G
It would be great if a season was designed for charity, This was not a good look for Survivor.
8 2
-
O
Gabler should not have won, first he did very little, second he is a doctor and probably already has a million dollars. Cassidy should have won, she played hard, had good strategies and won challenges when it was needed.
6 2
-
C
I’ve been noticing this happening a lot more recently in Survivor and Big Brother. In recent times, bigger resumes didnt win the game. IMHO the jurors either didn’t like the finalist despite their resume or the editors failed to show us what the unlikely winner has done to deserve it. With that said, I don’t mind Alligabler winning tho bc he has a big heart, so much so that he knows how to fix ‘em
4
-
G
Cassidy should have won. The vote was based on revenge, not who played the best. there was no need for her to go to fire with Jesse because she already beat him at the final immunity challenge. Nuff said. She came back strong at the end of the game, as did Owen, but people just didn't like them and would never have voted for them. Same thing happened in a previous Survivor where a person who hadn't won any immunity challenges won.
They should still have a Fan Favorite money prize to get outside the game..
3 1
-
O
He DESERVED IT!!!!
3 1
-
G
Yes Gabler definitely deserved to win he was so strategic and everybody underestimated him. It was so good to see Cassidy's face when Gabler won she thought she had it in the bag Hahahaha
3 1
-
O
Yes he deserved to win!
4 2
-
C
AS we've seen in past seasons and what has been leaked over the years, producers have a much greater influence than what the show admits to. This ending just confirms that, since it makes no sense for gabler to have won, other than the shows producers wanted it that way. .
4 2
-
R
Gabler's win has completely ruined Survivor for me. I fell asleep in the chair right after Guber won because it was so unjust and boring.
2 1
-
G
Wrong decision. I know Gabler said he is donating all the money but I doubt that money will go to them. Charities are scams. Jesse should have won.
5 4
-
C
I think it’s extremely telling when two of the three ppl left are absolutely and very visibly shocked by the outcome. I don’t think she would’ve been shocked had Owen won or vice versa. But the fact that someone who practically did nothing but whine and lose (except 1 out of 9 immunities) won…yeah, I highly doubt they were the only two with shocked faces…