‘Jeopardy!’ Host Ken Jennings Follows Up Political Posts With History & Etiquette Lessons

In the first week of the new year, Jeopardy! host Ken Jennings took to social media to decry recent issues involving America’s political climate.

In a series of bold posts on Bluesky, Jennings leaned into sarcasm and dark humor to comment on contemporary political trends. Rather than promoting a specific party or candidate, his remarks highlighted the absurdities and contradictions found across the political spectrum, drawing attention to the broader problems that shape public belief and discourse.

He also reposted news clippings and information about the fatal shooting in Minneapolis in which an ICE agent, identified as Jonathan Ross, shot and killed Renee Nicole Good during a federal immigration operation. According to USA Today, Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara said the woman was not the “target of any law enforcement investigation or activity.”

The posts struck a chord with Bluesky followers, many of whom praised Jennings for calling out many of the issues that currently define modern American politics. But with one post in particular, Jennings had a lot more to say.

On January 7, Jennings posted: “The ‘prosecute the former regime at every level’ candidate has my vote in 2028,” to which one follower responded, “If there’s an election in 2028.”

This kind of thing does point out a real ethical dilemma: block or mute?

[image or embed]

— Ken Jennings (@kenjennings.bsky.social) January 7, 2026 at 12:59 PM

In response to the cynical post, Jennings wrote, “This kind of thing does point out a real ethical dilemma: block or mute?” He then elaborated on his answer in a series of follow-up posts.

“A lot of replies here (obviously from people not already aware of The Discourse on this point) were genuinely confused variants on ‘But why, they’re right, that’s a valid concern.’ Let me leave a short thread for future readers explaining why that stuff is always unwelcome on here,” wrote the TV game show host.

A lot of replies here (obviously from people not already aware of The Discourse on this point) were genuinely confused variants on “But why, they’re right, that’s a valid concern.” Let me leave a short thread for future readers explaining why that stuff is always unwelcome on here. (1/n)

— Ken Jennings (@kenjennings.bsky.social) January 7, 2026 at 7:37 PM

“It’s totally understandable if you’re dooming about any facet of the American experiment right now. So your feelings are ‘valid’ in the sense that they represent real anxiety, and I get that. But to vent that anxiety in other people’s spaces is wrong for three reasons: First, it’s factually wrong. There will be elections in 2026 and 2028 under Trump, just like there were elections last year under Trump and during his first term. This despite one of the two major parties now harboring a lot of anti-democratic elements and ideas.”

It’s totally understandable if you’re dooming about any facet of the American experiment right now. So your feelings are “valid” in the sense that they represent real anxiety, and I get that. But to vent that anxiety in other people’s spaces is wrong for three reasons.

— Ken Jennings (@kenjennings.bsky.social) January 7, 2026 at 7:39 PM

“I’m not particularly interested in convincing anyone on this point and won’t try, the future is the future. But if the left side of the political spectrum is still the domain of scholarship and expertise, take note that you don’t find scholars and experts you worrying about canceled US elections,” continued Jennings.

“Second, and probably most importantly, it’s tactically wrong. ‘No point discussing political opposition to fascism, there won’t be elections anyway,’ cedes victory to your enemies. It’s defeatism and nihilism,” he posted.

“Finally, it’s wrong AS A MATTER OF ETIQUETTE. Entering a total stranger’s discussion and leading with your private anxiety is as off-putting in social media replies as it would be in real life. If you wouldn’t interrupt a stranger at a party to announce that America is doomed, don’t do it here,” wrote Jennings during the heated discussion.

Finally, it’s wrong AS A MATTER OF ETIQUETTE. Entering a total stranger’s discussion and leading with your private anxiety is as off-putting in social media replies as it would be in real life. If you wouldn’t interrupt a stranger at a party to announce that America is doomed, don’t do it here.

— Ken Jennings (@kenjennings.bsky.social) January 7, 2026 at 7:45 PM

“If you are anxious and sad about the state of the world, that’s fine, and there are plenty of strategies for dealing with that. But I think you already know that drive-by online dooming isn’t a strategy. It’s selfish and adolescent. It’s a contagion that only spreads the worst of you, not the best. Take a second and think before posting the easy Eeyore reply. You might have something substantive to say instead. Or, even better, you can say nothing at all,” concluded Jennings.

Responses to the posts have been overwhelming. “You’ve handled this spectacularly. Run for office,” wrote one follower.

Related

'Jeopardy!' Host Ken Jennings Makes Bold Political Statement — Fans React

“If there’s no tomorrow, then we might as well lie down in front of them and die. There’s no reason to live like that,” one fan agreed.

One user posted, “I don’t think that was the message of the post you’re replying to. THAT type of doomerism feels proactive to me, Germany was holding elections up to March of 1933 and none of us wants the US to get to that point. Which is why we need to be ACTIVE long before then and improve our opposition.”

And one fan summed up his followers’ reactions with the post: “What is ‘Who knew Ken Jennings kicks this much a**?” GOD BLESS HIM. DON’T STOP.'”